- Recent Posts
- News Feeds
- PPO Notes & Groups
- Site Help
- PPO's Principles of Preparedness
- Speaker's Bureau
- Gardening notes and charts
- Groups
- Meeting Minutes
- Council meeting minutes
- 2005-06 PPO Business meeting minutes
- 2005-10 PPO Business meeting minutes
- 2005-11 PPO Business meeting minutes
- 2006-01 PPO Business meeting minutes
- 2006-02 PPO Council meeting
- 2006-06 PPO Council meeting minutes
- 2006-07 PPO Council meeting minutes
- 2006-10 PPO Council meeting minutes
- 2007-01 PPO Council meeting minutes
- Council meeting minutes
- Portland Neighborhood Associations Links
- PO Task Force Position Paper
- PPO group management, process and logistics
- Resources
Put the brakes on anti-car drive (PPO mention from madison, wi.)
Submitted by nellie on January 25, 2007 - 8:28pm.
Recent clipping found via The Oil Drum...
TUE., JAN 23, 2007 - 5:04 PM
A Wisconsin State Journal editorial
Let's hope Mayor Dave Cieslewicz and Dane County Executive Kathleen Falk summon the good sense to take the report they have received from the Peak Oil Task Force and file it under "T."
For twaddle.
The Peak Oil Task Force is part of a national network of groups obsessed with the catastrophe they believe will befall the Earth after oil production passes its peak and hits the skids.
They have made gas-guzzling autos Public Enemy No. 1, and they want us all to prepare for the doomsday that cars will inflict on us.
They are, to the left wing of the political spectrum, what the gun-toters living in bunkers in Idaho are to the right wing.
Except there is no evidence they are dangerous.
Unless somebody in a decision-making position starts buying in to their recommendations.
For example, check out the recommendations in the report sent to Cieslewicz and Falk from the Downtown Isthmus Group of the Peak Oil Task Force. Here are a few of the anti-car proposals:
•Penalize people who drive gas-hog cars. Use fines and prohibitions.
•Ban the sale of private cars on the public airwaves.
•Require that all new apartment buildings and condominiums be built without parking.
Then look at the doomsday fears underlying a few of the other recommendations:
•Ban new buildings taller than 60 feet because power blackouts will disable elevators.
•Plant fruit trees throughout the city to provide calories in case a breakdown in the transportation system means no food shipments reach Madison.
OK, we're all for conservation and alternative energy sources, etc., etc. But fining folks for daring to drive a car? Limiting buildings to five stories? We have a word for that, and the word is loony.
Surely no political leaders would ever encourage this bunch, right?
Wrong.
The city of Portland, Ore., - one of Mayor Dave's favorite models - has succumbed to pressure from Peak Oil activists and appointed an official committee to study how Portland should prepare for the "post- carbon" age.
So far, Madison's Peak Oil Task Force remains strictly an unofficial group spouting unofficial nonsense.
Surely, Madison and Dane County leaders will be smart enough to keep it that way.
Right?
========================================================
Name calling and total absence of rational argument. If it is all nonsense, why are you unable to refute any of the assertions of peak oil?
==================
ETA: More coverage from local TV station http://www.wkowtv.com/News/index.php?ID=8917
Note that on mac, the streaming video would only play under internet exploder.

ah, the hand wavy defense
Heh, I love it with people attack the idea of peak oil without addressing any of the geological or geo-political underpinnings. They basically just dismiss the idea out of hand and wildly miss the point.
I haven't interacted with many of the peak oil a groups around the country so I can't speak to specifics. Personally I have found it useful avoid bans and making specific predictions as they both don't really add anything useful to the debate/preparation _and_ usually provide something for opponents to react against. The above rant is a good example of things gone wrong and set things up so the debate is about the debate, rather then a debate of the issues.
my response to Editor Ellen Foley
Your editorial from Jan. 23, 2007 contains no sensible
argument against Peak Oil Task Force members or their
recommendations. It's apparent your publication makes
money from automobile sales and that you believe in an
inherent right to guzzle gas at the expense of our
planet and our children's generation. Your one-sided
view reeks of selfish entitlement and you've done
nothing to serve the future interests of Madison. Your
opinion is short-sighted and I would strongly urge you
to lend a serious critique to Portland's draft report
which is available for public comment.
http://www.portlandonline.com/osd/index.cfm?c=42894
May you wake up and realize the consequences of your
actions,